It's time to celebrate freedom!  The freedom to lose yourself in a good book.  The freedom to think a new thought, to ponder a new idea.  The freedom to see life as someone else does, to temporarily live inside someone else's mind, seeing life from their point of view.  How do you do all of that?  READING!
  And as they have done for years, the American Library Association (ALA) is encouraging us to consider the various books that have been challenged, if not outright banned...from public schools, from public libraries.  See that's where I have a problem.  I don't mind if you don't want your child to read a particular book, and believe me, most schools these days are quick to offer an alternative read to any student whose parent objects.  What I have a problem with is when you try to tell me that my child can't read that book either!  And yes, I know, I've read the argument that nothing is to stop my child from reading it at home...just like nothing is to stop my child from sharing it with your child after school, when they are hanging out together, and the subject comes up...and it will.
  But public schools and libraries are supposed to be a place of learning...of opening minds, thinking new thoughts, seeing the world in a new way.  When the only ideas students are allowed to think in school are familiar ones, where is the education?  Instead that is inculcation, the injecting of someone's morals into that child, with no discussion allowed as to whether or not that child agrees.
  So as an English teacher, and as an independent thinker, I strongly encourage you to pick up a banned book and enjoy being a rebel!  There's still a few days left in the official Banned Books week, but you can read them anytime and enjoy them. 
  The AARP published a list of the 50 books most objected to, including To Kill a Mockingbird, Catcher in the Rye, and the Harry Potter stories, along with the Twilight series.  Some are well-written and considered classics.  Some are poorly-written and will be forgotten in a few years' time, when the initial popularity has worn thin.  But all have ideas that someone considers dangerous for young people to contemplate.  Honestly?  With all the media stimulation that today's young people are exposed to, do you really feel that a well-written book that presents adult content in a way that allows them to imagine it, rather than be bombarded with images that might be truly disturbing, is so hazardous? (Have your kids seen Saw?)
  BTW, my teen-aged daughter found the Twilight books to be rather dull, but she loves the movies because of the abs on the werewolves!  Okay, at least as her mother who is also an erotic romance writer, we can agree on something!
 


Comments

09/29/2010 17:53

I'm hot in the middle of finishing up a novella BUT - I've been wearing my "I Read Banned Books" button all week! Sad to say, not one person has asked me about it!

Reply
Fiona McGier
09/30/2010 13:31

I've been wearing mine too! Many people read so little that they don't fear the ideas in books. They think banning books is almost "quaint". But it's a very real threat to free speech and education. Get yourself a button too at: www.northernsun.com

Reply
Bill Harris
09/30/2010 16:10

I will check out the list. Can I take this opportunity to say I never liked Catcher in the Rye? I wonder how many people "like" it because they were told it is great literature and they don't want to look stupid. (me I have no such fear) I give it a "Meh" and a "whatever".

Reply
Fiona McGier
09/30/2010 19:51

Hey Bill, I know it's not because you found all of the swearing offensive! ;-D But to each their own. I have always detested Hemingway, but had to read a few of his along the way. And when I was teaching and assigned essays about books, guess which was chosen the most by the students, so I had to read about it over and over and over, ad nauseum? Old Man and the Sea, of course! Why? It was the shortest book on the list! It just SEEMED to go on forever to me!

Reply
John McColl
09/30/2010 21:01

...and the banned played on.

Reply
Carla Carroll
09/30/2010 21:19

I'll have to check it out to see how many of them I've missed and put them on my own list!

I read Catcher in the Rye such a long time ago I mostly remember the hype about it and, yes, the swearing. Not much else. Maybe I should read it again?

Reply
Jacquline
10/01/2010 15:09

Yes I agree that we should not be told what to read and not to read. That reminds me of Farenhiet 451 the movie where they burned the books so they went one step further. I personally did not like Catcher in the Rye but I did like To Kill a Mockingbird, a book I think that should be banned is Fences, I was very offended and even more so when my children being the only one of color in their class, had to read. There is much more appropriate literature out there than that book.

Reply
Robin
10/01/2010 21:44

I love to read. I will read anything once and many more if I like it. Sadly lately I have only been able to do audiobooks. Regular books are hard to hold while I fold laundry>LOL How do you know if a book is bad if you dont read it? Many people who hate certain
books have not even read them.

Reply
Fiona
10/02/2010 10:31

Unfortunately, many people are too lazy to think for themselves, so they accept the judgment of others as to whether or not a book is "good"...which is of course, just an opinion. Personally, I reread Catcher in the Rye when my own kids had to read it, and I still thought it was a good book for teenagers, to let them know they are not the only ones who feel "disenchanted" with their approaching adulthood. F-451 is one of my favorite books, both to read and to teach, ditto Mockingbird. Audio books are a good thing for lots of folks. There is even software that will "read" eBooks to you, but probably prohibitively expensive, for now.
I'm loving all of these comments! Thanks!

Reply



Leave a Reply